<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Research Enterprise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rtei.org/blog/index.php/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rtei.org/blog</link>
	<description>Technology transfer, intellectual property, and cockroach living</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 13:38:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>More Evidence in the Wild</title>
		<link>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/22/more-evidence-in-the-wild/</link>
		<comments>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/22/more-evidence-in-the-wild/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 02:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Barnett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bayh-Dole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford v Roche]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/22/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is another example in the wild of the mischaracterization of Bayh-Dole.  This is a document that offers a &#8220;Brief Guide to Intellectual Property in a University Context&#8221;.   My point is to document how Bayh-Dole has been represented by university &#8230; <a href="http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/22/more-evidence-in-the-wild/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/22/more-evidence-in-the-wild/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The BioBrick BPA and Group Dynamics</title>
		<link>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/15/the-biobrick-bpa-and-group-dynamics/</link>
		<comments>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/15/the-biobrick-bpa-and-group-dynamics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 15:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Barnett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ageements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Present Assignment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Transfer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/15/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The BioBricks Foundation supports a repository of &#8220;parts&#8221; for use in synthetic biology.  It has implemented an interesting two-part arrangement called the BioBrick Public Agreement or BPA.  This agreement aims to manage the interests of contributors and users of the &#8230; <a href="http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/15/the-biobrick-bpa-and-group-dynamics/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/15/the-biobrick-bpa-and-group-dynamics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thinking back to think ahead</title>
		<link>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/12/thinking-back-to-think-ahead/</link>
		<comments>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/12/thinking-back-to-think-ahead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 01:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Barnett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Transfer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/12/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have added a new page to the blog, Cottrell on Patents.  There you can find Cottrell&#8217;s 1912 essay explaining why he started Research Corporation.  Also, I&#8217;ve added a link to a historical account of Cottrell&#8217;s work and Research Corporation. &#8230; <a href="http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/12/thinking-back-to-think-ahead/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/12/thinking-back-to-think-ahead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blasts from the Past</title>
		<link>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/12/blasts-from-the-past/</link>
		<comments>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/12/blasts-from-the-past/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 17:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Barnett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bayh-Dole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanford v Roche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Transfer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/12/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is the University of Arizona invention policy statement from 1939.  Simple voluntary approach with a breakout for expressly set out positions, with inventors owing 10% of their proceeds to the University if they are not using Research Corporation and &#8230; <a href="http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/12/blasts-from-the-past/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/12/blasts-from-the-past/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No-troll covenants</title>
		<link>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/08/no-troll-covenants/</link>
		<comments>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/08/no-troll-covenants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 21:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Barnett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Transfer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/08/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter has announced an Innovator&#8217;s Patent Agreement (thanks for the link, Steve) that gives inventors some rights that run with any assignment of patents on their inventions.   Inventors retain a right license with right to sublicense in the event that &#8230; <a href="http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/08/no-troll-covenants/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/08/no-troll-covenants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We are going to have the discussion anyway</title>
		<link>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/04/we-are-going-to-have-the-discussion-anyway/</link>
		<comments>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/04/we-are-going-to-have-the-discussion-anyway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 21:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Barnett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bayh-Dole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Transfer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/04/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Karen White over at Almost White Pages has good thoughts about the challenges of providing university inventors with choices about who manages their inventions.  It&#8217;s clear this is not an easy issue, and I agree with Karen that it is &#8230; <a href="http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/04/we-are-going-to-have-the-discussion-anyway/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/04/we-are-going-to-have-the-discussion-anyway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You already do</title>
		<link>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/04/you-already-do/</link>
		<comments>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/04/you-already-do/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 17:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Barnett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Transfer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/04/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the Bayh-Allen view of things, university technology transfer offices do not have the capacity or resources to handle inventions other than those made by their own faculty.  This is at the heart of &#8220;this compulsory assignment business is really &#8230; <a href="http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/04/you-already-do/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/04/you-already-do/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Research patent price setting as pro-innovation</title>
		<link>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/01/research-patent-price-setting-as-pro-innovation/</link>
		<comments>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/01/research-patent-price-setting-as-pro-innovation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 03:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Barnett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology Transfer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/01/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is an insightful piece of work on new approaches to patent licensing for universities. Jonathan Hillel, &#8220;Legal Trubulence after Leegin: New Possibilities for Patent Licensing at Research Institutions.&#8221; Hillel looks at anti-trust issues related to price setting and argues &#8230; <a href="http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/01/research-patent-price-setting-as-pro-innovation/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/01/research-patent-price-setting-as-pro-innovation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Non-technology transfer exploitation of university patents</title>
		<link>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/01/non-technology-transfer-exploitation-of-university-patents/</link>
		<comments>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/01/non-technology-transfer-exploitation-of-university-patents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 23:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Barnett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Transfer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/01/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jon Brodkin at Ars Technica reports on a patent dispute between Yahoo and Facebook.  Yahoo filed a patent infringement case against Facebook in March, and now Facebook has acquired 10 patents from patent accumulators&#8211;otherwise called trolls or non-operating entities&#8211;to assert &#8230; <a href="http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/01/non-technology-transfer-exploitation-of-university-patents/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/05/01/non-technology-transfer-exploitation-of-university-patents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What rot hath Bayh-Dole wrought?</title>
		<link>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/04/28/what-rot-hath-bayh-dole-wrought/</link>
		<comments>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/04/28/what-rot-hath-bayh-dole-wrought/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2012 18:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Barnett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bayh-Dole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rtei.org/blog/2012/04/28/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What hath Bayh-Dole wrought?  Or, more pointedly, what have university invention administrators done with the opportunity presented by Bayh-Dole? Over the past 30 years, university administrators have successfully: Changed a clustered federal system of patent accumulation into a dispersed university &#8230; <a href="http://rtei.org/blog/2012/04/28/what-rot-hath-bayh-dole-wrought/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rtei.org/blog/2012/04/28/what-rot-hath-bayh-dole-wrought/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

